Aquaculture: Improve or die

I reread a post published two years ago in "The Fish Site" and that once it caught my attention: "Aquaculture Must improve or die, say experts". I want to see how a certain remains. The Norwegian aquaculture industry is a world leader in innovation, but insist that this is not enough to guarantee the future of the industry. To address the real challenges that exist (and they say based on a series of studies of an industry that has produced 1.2 million tons) no choice but to continue investing in innovation, in fact, and even define the aquaculture sector Norwegian as the most innovative, not the biggest, emphasize the difficulty to continue "growing".

It is understood, I understand, by growth, which affects both the production and the benefit of the activity. This latter is very important because it is this margin that pays almost exclusively the needs innovation of the sector, and it is clear that it should remain, including increasing the effort as the "industries that fail to improve, to innovate, they die".

Space availability, pricing, genetic improvement, technological radical solutions, feeding management, new sources of supply ... anything that does not sound to us.

The main difference is that they have clear that innovation is the engine of competitiveness and that this difference can only get being and thinking differently.

Currently, the companies value more what we do than what we say we have studied. This change is providing the entry of a new human capital, highly talented, that will revolutionize the way we understand the configuration of human resources in companies.

This need for experts and beyond conventional wisdom, is the new way to boost the activities carried out in VUCA environments. 
Aquaculture is a perfect example.